LAST INTERN STANDING IN A WORLD OF SELF-RELIANCE
By Joan R. Magee
May 3, 2009
It is easy to see that a greater self-reliance must work a revolution in all the offices and relations of men; in their religion; in their education; in their pursuits; their modes of living; their association; in their property; in their speculative views.
--Ralph Waldo Emerson, Self-Reliance
I am officially one of the last interns ever to work at the now-extinct Conde Nast Portfolio. The signs were coming even before I started working there in January, but accelerated with each passing week. Ninety percent of the online staff was gone the week before I began, including the woman who hired me (she’s now working on a side project and from what I hear, freelancing.) I worked in a room with 12 empty desks, and three occupied ones. The other two people, with whom I worked, Sharon and Joe (not their real names) had gone from full-time employees to part-time independent contractors. They let go of the receptionist, so guests had to call from a phone by the front doors. Joe had put in his resignation a week before the magazine folded, hoping to jump ship from New York and get a full-time job down South. Sharon was constantly talking about the imminent demise of her job, and mentioned this often in hushed but frightened tones. Those people, along with the others still employed by the magazine, are now more bodies dumped into the wilting U.S. and New York City job market.
I hate to wring my hands about job losses in media alone, but it’s what I witnessed first hand. And as a former freelancer, I know what it's like to be a sole proprietor in a world that seems to be set up for corporations. Reading and covering the news about all the layoffs and dismal unemployment rates, I can't help but wonder how the swarms of free agents out there in the market will react. What will the corporate structure look like as more people are either voluntarily or involuntarily leaving the trusty mother ships of large media companies, financial corporations, auto makers, and so on?
Riding the train, the advertisements for The Freelancer's Union are everywhere. In the middle is a hive and a worker bee, and usually some revolutionary, harsh-looking font a la the Communist movements in the Eastern Bloc. Slogans like: "Freelancers Shouldn't Be Taxed Twice," and "The Squeaky Wheel Gets the Grease," appear on ads for the organization. In fact, in 2008, the New York City's Freelancer's Union grew from 65,000 to 100,000 people. They are reporting new membership applications now, and foresee more in the future.
New York City, before and definitely now, seems like the place to cater to those who'd like to live an independent lifestyle -- but with a retirement plan and health benefits. One oft mentioned issue when talking about freelancers or those who work and live outside of the 9:00 to 5:00 superstructure is the question of health insurance. It's been debated and discussed ad nauseam: The American system is terrible, other countries systems are better and we need reform. That all seems to be true from what first hand experience I have, but I also do believe that relying solely on a governmental health plan is never going to satisfy every health need, and economic externalities will create a very expensive mass system indeed.
The only problem is that as work dries up for a lot of freelancers (as full-time employees are laid off and then "re-hired" as independent contractors, like at Portfolio) freelancers are left without as much work and less money, ostensibly and less money to spend on a good insurance plan, even though that's a necessity for most. I know at least a dozen "healthy" twentysomethings without families who work without any form of health insurance and go to emergency rooms if they happen to have a problem that warrants a doctor. Reliance on yourself is one thing; relying on an ER to get what some would consider standard medical procedures is another. This then puts pressure on the whole system and brings us full circle to the question: What can we do for free agents in a non-socialistic society? In a time when companies are being bankrolled by the government, and quasi-governmental agencies like Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae are now wholly governmental agencies, where does this all leave the individual worker? Where's that safe hive after all? Temporary work, short-term jobs and freelance contracts seem like they’re becoming the norm. The uncertainty of the economic turnaround makes it hard for companies to know if it’s safe to hire full-time workers (and the hefty health benefit costs that come along with them.) Workers, then, are left to their own devices. The days of staying with one company for a career seem almost quaint, if not laughable now.
Without the long-term loyalty to anyone but yourself, is it a better end game for a worker? Should we be mobile modern gypsies for hire? Perhaps when you’re faced with that as one of the only viable options, people adjust and will make whatever messy hive they end up in work. Joe and Sharon and the others like them (you, or me, or who knows who else?) will be buzzing around, looking for the next transitory hive.